Total Commodity Programs in Lee County, Florida, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 67
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Lee County, Florida totaled $6,664,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jamerson Farms Llp | Lehigh Acres, FL 33970 | $1,000,000 |
2 | Frisbie Farms LLC | Fort Myers, FL 33912 | $1,000,000 |
3 | Divine Tomatoes Inc | Immokalee, FL 34143 | $897,484 |
4 | Swfl Tomato Farms LLC | Cape Coral, FL 33909 | $650,811 |
5 | Farmer Mikes Produce Inc. | Bonita Springs, FL 34135 | $586,352 |
6 | Florida Citrus Company | Alva, FL 33920 | $482,348 |
7 | Hermilo Tello Sr | Estero, FL 33929 | $334,389 |
8 | Madeline Sexton | Naples, FL 34119 | $313,379 |
9 | Charles J Chance | Labelle, FL 33935 | $298,002 |
10 | Nch Palms LLC | Pineland, FL 33945 | $209,066 |
11 | Trademark Palms Inc | Pineland, FL 33945 | $124,241 |
12 | Nelson Groves Inc | Lake Wales, FL 33859 | $50,672 |
13 | Arnold Sarlo And Richard Cuda Cattle And Land Serv | Alva, FL 33920 | $48,180 |
14 | John Hall | Bokeelia, FL 33922 | $39,971 |
15 | Ckr Land Development LLC | Fort Myers, FL 33919 | $38,814 |
16 | Jeffery L Flint | Lehigh Acres, FL 33970 | $30,257 |
17 | W-30 Palms LLC | Pineland, FL 33945 | $29,212 |
18 | Dean & Dean Palms LLC | Pineland, FL 33945 | $28,957 |
19 | Queen B Cattle Company LLC | Alva, FL 33920 | $26,917 |
20 | Samuel Kirk Heimdahl | Fort Myers, FL 33912 | $26,299 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>