SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Saint Lucie County, Florida, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 29

Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Saint Lucie County, Florida totaled $2,356,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program
1995-2021
1All Right Groves LLCFort Pierce, FL 34945$300,000
2Cartay Groves LLCVero Beach, FL 32960$300,000
3Citcran CorporationVero Beach, FL 32963$200,000
4William R Daniels Living TrustPlant City, FL 33566$181,967
5Varn Citrus IncFort Pierce, FL 34954$162,623
6Rainbow Groves IncFort Pierce, FL 34948$148,908
7Cassens Citrus Development IncFort Pierce, FL 34954$141,948
8Double George GrovesVero Beach, FL 32961$106,583
9Martin Properties Of Palm Beach CBoynton Beach, FL 33436$96,860
10Courtney ForgetFort Pierce, FL 34951$81,372
11Cassens Grove Service IncFort Pierce, FL 34954$74,640
12Hickory Branch Property IncFort Pierce, FL 34945$64,310
13White City Grove IncFort Pierce, FL 34954$57,032
14Peter FischelOcean Springs, MS 39566$53,241
15Pm Groves LLCFort Pierce, FL 34987$51,068
16Cassens Land Enterprises IncFort Pierce, FL 34954$50,671
17Varn Family Irrevocable TrustFort Pierce, FL 34982$45,965
18Forget Brothers Groves LLCFort Pierce, FL 34979$45,356
19Buck Hammock Groves IncFort Pierce, FL 34951$28,102
20Daniel T Mccarty IIIFort Pierce, FL 34948$26,830

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag