Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Georgia, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 11,189

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Georgia totaled $118,804,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2021
1Southwest Georgia Farm Credit **Bainbridge, GA 39817$951,965
2First State Bank Of Blakely **Colquitt, GA 39837$751,945
3O'hearn Farms PartnershipShellman, GA 39886$601,170
4Scott Farms G PBrinson, GA 39825$561,677
5Sauls PartnershipShellman, GA 39886$508,436
6Heard Family FarmBrinson, GA 39825$497,569
73rt FarmsDonalsonville, GA 39845$479,382
8Aggeorgia Farm Credit Aca **Ocilla, GA 31774$425,837
9Minerva Plantation GpPerry, GA 31069$393,540
10United National Bank **Cairo, GA 39828$386,860
11Harvey Jordan Farms PartnershipLeary, GA 39862$382,858
12Onesouth Bank **Dawson, GA 39842$382,254
13Dollar Family FarmsBainbridge, GA 39818$381,620
14Minor Brothers Farm PartnershipAndersonville, GA 31711$378,834
15Jerry Jr & Jeff Heard FarmsNewton, GA 39870$378,739
16Curry Farm PartnersShellman, GA 39886$366,147
17Michigan Homes Dba Oak Hill Farms IncLeesburg, GA 31763$360,830
18Lee Farms GpBronwood, GA 39826$331,410
19Bank Of Camilla **Camilla, GA 31730$331,305
20Hanna Farming PartnershipDonalsonville, GA 39845$331,067

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag