Total Commodity Programs in Clinch County, Georgia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 49
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clinch County, Georgia totaled $585,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Suwannee Creek Blueberries LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $72,587 |
2 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $43,703 |
3 | Claude Morris Landrum | Homerville, GA 31634 | $40,390 |
4 | James Morris Landrum | Homerville, GA 31634 | $39,950 |
5 | Hinson Farms LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $29,910 |
6 | Barry Evan Hart | Fargo, GA 31631 | $28,958 |
7 | Darley Creek Blueberry Farms LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $24,823 |
8 | Jnk Berry Farms Inc | Homerville, GA 31634 | $23,820 |
9 | Bell's Berry Patch | Homerville, GA 31634 | $23,683 |
10 | Bambis Bees Inc | Homerville, GA 31634 | $22,345 |
11 | Dewey Lamar Lankford | Homerville, GA 31634 | $16,987 |
12 | Cox Blueberry Farm Inc | Homerville, GA 31634 | $15,084 |
13 | Midway Berries LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $12,992 |
14 | Lutz Berry Farm LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $12,783 |
15 | Triple H Honey LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $12,119 |
16 | Heather T Bell | Homerville, GA 31634 | $11,355 |
17 | Bennett's Honey Co LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $11,281 |
18 | Palmetto Ridge Berries LLC | Homerville, GA 31634 | $10,727 |
19 | Suwannee River Honey Company Inc | Fargo, GA 31631 | $10,663 |
20 | David Chandler Riberon | Naylor, GA 31641 | $9,893 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>