Total Commodity Programs in Seminole County, Georgia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 161
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Seminole County, Georgia totaled $6,928,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Southwest Georgia Farm Credit ** | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $757,255 |
2 | First Port City Bank ** | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $738,262 |
3 | First State Bank Of Blakely ** | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $592,793 |
4 | 3rt Farms | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $537,044 |
5 | Bank Of Terrell ** | Dawson, GA 39842 | $419,044 |
6 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $292,673 |
7 | 4 Miller Farms | Iron City, GA 39859 | $250,985 |
8 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $243,279 |
9 | Thompson Family Farms | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $205,395 |
10 | Peoples South Bank ** | Greenwood, FL 32443 | $173,072 |
11 | Rgt Farms | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $160,590 |
12 | Triple S Farms | Iron City, GA 39859 | $129,544 |
13 | United National Bank ** | Cairo, GA 39828 | $126,598 |
14 | Eddie Miller Farms Inc | Iron City, GA 39859 | $120,936 |
15 | Cedar Head Farms A General Partnership | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $87,707 |
16 | Scott Farms G P | Brinson, GA 39825 | $84,514 |
17 | L & L Farms Inc | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $81,801 |
18 | Eddie Miller Farming Part LLC | Iron City, GA 39859 | $80,137 |
19 | 3e Miller Farms Inc | Iron City, GA 39859 | $80,136 |
20 | Brantley Broome Farms Inc | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $78,470 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>