Total Conservation Programs in Hawaii, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 396
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Hawaii totaled $11,170,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hlh LLC | Honolulu, HI 96823 | $3,366,477 |
| 2 | Lanai Institute For The Environm | Lanai City, HI 96763 | $763,871 |
| 3 | Ponoholo Ranch Ltd | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $731,136 |
| 4 | Kahua Ranch Limited | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $697,634 |
| 5 | Duane T Shimogawa | Lawai, HI 96765 | $381,569 |
| 6 | Ducks Unlimited | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $253,687 |
| 7 | Dunbar Ranch Properties LLC | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $224,689 |
| 8 | Agee Inc | Ninole, HI 96773 | $211,751 |
| 9 | Susan Lundburg Dba Susan Kaye Lundburg Trust | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $184,064 |
| 10 | Medeiros Farm Inc | Kalaheo, HI 96741 | $182,475 |
| 11 | Jerry Egami | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $147,197 |
| 12 | Hui O Mana LLC | Kailua, HI 96734 | $139,507 |
| 13 | Steven Howard Shropshire | Hilo, HI 96721 | $134,685 |
| 14 | Hind Daleico LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $128,872 |
| 15 | North Shore Cattle Company LLC | Ewa Beach, HI 96706 | $121,547 |
| 16 | Peter Kubota | Hilo, HI 96720 | $112,833 |
| 17 | Puu O Hoku Ranch Ltd | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $112,739 |
| 18 | Wellington Enterprises LLC | Eleele, HI 96705 | $106,547 |
| 19 | Mccandless Land & Cattle Company | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $84,793 |
| 20 | William J Sanchez | Kapaa, HI 96746 | $71,568 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf