Farm Subsidy information
Maui County, Hawaii
Total Subsidies in Maui County, Hawaii, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 94
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Maui County, Hawaii totaled $660,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kula Country Farms LLC | Kula, HI 96790 | $91,130 |
| 2 | Loe Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $51,950 |
| 3 | Kaupo Ranch Ltd | Lihue, HI 96766 | $40,768 |
| 4 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $40,717 |
| 5 | Bryan Takeshi Otani | Makawao, HI 96768 | $38,628 |
| 6 | Fe Traje Farm LLC | Makawao, HI 96768 | $38,443 |
| 7 | Christian Chica Rili | Kula, HI 96790 | $23,202 |
| 8 | Ricky Rikio Kametani | Kula, HI 96790 | $18,100 |
| 9 | Cabaero Farm LLC | Wailuku, HI 96793 | $16,523 |
| 10 | William Gerard Jacintho | Kula, HI 96790 | $13,423 |
| 11 | Dunbar Ranch Properties LLC | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $13,217 |
| 12 | Thompson Ranch & Riding Stables LLC | Kula, HI 96790 | $8,221 |
| 13 | Chase Jon Scott Stephenson | Makawao, HI 96768 | $8,129 |
| 14 | Rory James Souza | Makawao, HI 96768 | $7,181 |
| 15 | James C Sakugawa & Sons | Kula, HI 96790 | $6,441 |
| 16 | Evonuk Farms LLC | Kula, HI 96790 | $6,441 |
| 17 | Howards Nurseries Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $6,441 |
| 18 | Steven Chaikin | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $6,441 |
| 19 | Ono Organic Farms Inc | Hana, HI 96713 | $6,441 |
| 20 | Maui Floral Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $6,441 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf