Conservation Reserve Program in Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,698
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Idaho totaled $869,156,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shoshone Bannock Tribe | Fort Hall, ID 83203 | $18,007,498 |
2 | Spratling Farms | Burley, ID 83318 | $5,212,836 |
3 | Nelson 7ud Ranches | Rockland, ID 83271 | $4,666,890 |
4 | Evans Brothers Farm | Arbon, ID 83212 | $4,179,660 |
5 | Cold Springs Farm Partnership | Newton, UT 84327 | $3,745,897 |
6 | Harris Ag | Malta, ID 83342 | $3,193,418 |
7 | Hartvigsen Brothers | Centerville, UT 84014 | $2,908,715 |
8 | Cardene Enterprises | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $2,901,845 |
9 | Thompson Farms Partnership | Pingree, ID 83262 | $2,725,417 |
10 | Simmons Brothers Partners | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 | $2,521,849 |
11 | J D Woodard & Sons Ptr | Idaho Falls, ID 83404 | $2,486,623 |
12 | Ward Farms | Arbon, ID 83212 | $2,367,347 |
13 | Woodworth Partnership | American Falls, ID 83211 | $2,142,931 |
14 | Nebeker Bros | Salt Lake City, UT 84108 | $2,027,024 |
15 | B & R Farms | Mesquite, NV 89027 | $1,930,388 |
16 | Koompin Farms | American Falls, ID 83211 | $1,924,990 |
17 | Lazy Dj Partnership | Burley, ID 83318 | $1,828,062 |
18 | Black Rock Partnership | Ririe, ID 83443 | $1,702,075 |
19 | Nez Perce Tribe | Lapwai, ID 83540 | $1,646,033 |
20 | Kendall Jones Farms | Burley, ID 83318 | $1,638,669 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>