Farm Subsidy information
Camas County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Camas County, Idaho, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 138
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Camas County, Idaho totaled $1,997,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wolf One Farms Inc | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $142,500 |
2 | Selby Crossing LLC | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $103,473 |
3 | Prescott Cattle And Consulting LLC | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $98,521 |
4 | Lou & Teresa Andersen Ranches, Inc | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $93,868 |
5 | Clinton Royce Wolf | Boise, ID 83706 | $59,651 |
6 | Simon Farms Inc | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $56,644 |
7 | Willow Creek Ranch LLC | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $52,988 |
8 | Wolf Springs Ranch | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $50,491 |
9 | Jacob J Ashmead | Corral, ID 83322 | $50,369 |
10 | David E Coates | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $41,174 |
11 | Mclam Farms Inc | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $39,548 |
12 | C S Miller | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $36,699 |
13 | Smith Prairie Land Cattle Outfit | Napa, CA 94559 | $32,924 |
14 | Ellsworth Weatherly | Corral, ID 83322 | $29,884 |
15 | Delbert Mcmurdo Jr | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $29,240 |
16 | Dirk Hallowell Dba 010 Ranch | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $26,983 |
17 | Gordon Schmidt Dba Bar H Bar Ranch | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $25,877 |
18 | Unser Hay Company LLC | Sun Valley, ID 83353 | $25,674 |
19 | Jimmy D Kramer | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $25,046 |
20 | Crandall Family Farms Inc | Fairfield, ID 83327 | $25,038 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>