Production Flexibility Program in Fremont County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 617
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Fremont County, Idaho totaled $11,033,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cornelison Farms Part | Rexburg, ID 83440 | $594,943 |
2 | Skyline Farms | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $299,159 |
3 | Hughes Farms Inc | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $280,650 |
4 | Dean Schwendiman And Sons Inc | Newdale, ID 83436 | $248,133 |
5 | Kandler Farms Inc | Ashton, ID 83420 | $215,502 |
6 | Jerald K Dalling | Sugar City, ID 83448 | $211,779 |
7 | Riverside Farms Part | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $205,334 |
8 | Crapo Farms Inc | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $198,263 |
9 | Parkinson Seed Farms Inc | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $186,157 |
10 | Hess Farms Inc | Ashton, ID 83420 | $181,483 |
11 | Dan Reynolds | Ashton, ID 83420 | $180,403 |
12 | Paul Cherry Farms Part | Bozeman, MT 59719 | $174,970 |
13 | Blair Parker | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $142,423 |
14 | Stohl Ranches Inc | Ashton, ID 83420 | $139,159 |
15 | Tng Farms | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $132,777 |
16 | R H Hawkes And Sons Inc | Ashton, ID 83420 | $128,526 |
17 | Hawkes Management Corporation | Ashton, ID 83420 | $125,423 |
18 | Raybould Brothers LLC | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $119,910 |
19 | Kip O Martindale | Ashton, ID 83420 | $117,240 |
20 | Dickason Family Farms | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $117,029 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>