Farm Subsidy information
Kootenai County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Kootenai County, Idaho, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 164
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kootenai County, Idaho totaled $1,326,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Millhorn Farm Inc | Worley, ID 83876 | $90,357 |
| 2 | Rhonda Chase | Newman Lake, WA 99025 | $68,527 |
| 3 | Harold E Chase Jr | Newman Lake, WA 99025 | $59,779 |
| 4 | Degon Family Farms Joint Venture | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $47,069 |
| 5 | Craig Christensen | Hayden, ID 83835 | $42,836 |
| 6 | Hahner Farms Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $39,393 |
| 7 | Kootenai Properties Inc | Bear Valley Springs, CA 93561 | $29,518 |
| 8 | Freeburg Farms Inc | Worley, ID 83876 | $28,188 |
| 9 | Mfi Custom LLC | Worley, ID 83876 | $28,015 |
| 10 | Ness Properties LLC | Rockford, WA 99030 | $21,233 |
| 11 | Darin Jenneskens | Worley, ID 83876 | $21,056 |
| 12 | Rock Creek Land Company | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $20,960 |
| 13 | Drechsel Brothers | Worley, ID 83876 | $18,950 |
| 14 | Jacot Farms Inc | Rockford, WA 99030 | $17,248 |
| 15 | Hmillhorn LLC | Worley, ID 83876 | $17,042 |
| 16 | Coeur D'alene Tribe | Plummer, ID 83851 | $16,717 |
| 17 | Cody R Chase | Spokane, WA 99206 | $14,767 |
| 18 | Lampert Farm And Ranch Inc | Worley, ID 83876 | $13,088 |
| 19 | Jeff Bloomsburg | Worley, ID 83876 | $12,497 |
| 20 | Terry Nichols | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $12,314 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf