Farm Subsidy information
Oneida County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Oneida County, Idaho, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 450
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $9,295,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S Bar S Ranch, LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $333,052 |
| 2 | Hubbard Land & Lvstk | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $252,292 |
| 3 | Ngw Ranch LLC | Ogden, UT 84409 | $239,609 |
| 4 | Justin E Lake | Malad, ID 83252 | $167,032 |
| 5 | Potter Ranches LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $144,198 |
| 6 | Jeff E Alder | Malad City, ID 83252 | $137,325 |
| 7 | Rushton Farms LLC | Magna, UT 84044 | $131,005 |
| 8 | Simpsons S Bar S LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $123,836 |
| 9 | Robert D Sorensen | Malad City, ID 83252 | $119,894 |
| 10 | Klm Farms LLC | Grantsville, UT 84029 | $119,719 |
| 11 | Eliason Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $116,933 |
| 12 | Hansen's Grain Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $108,000 |
| 13 | Willie Cattle Company LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $107,564 |
| 14 | Brad Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $101,292 |
| 15 | Lee Ann Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $101,292 |
| 16 | Tyrell G. Thomas | Malad City, ID 83252 | $100,111 |
| 17 | Firth Cattle Company Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $98,234 |
| 18 | Austin Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $97,146 |
| 19 | Denton C John | Portage, UT 84331 | $94,713 |
| 20 | Wright Bros Partnership | Malad City, ID 83252 | $93,939 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf