Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 235
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $1,050,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eliason Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $51,297 |
| 2 | Ngw Ranch LLC | Ogden, UT 84409 | $44,950 |
| 3 | Dale F Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $35,088 |
| 4 | Jeff E Alder | Malad City, ID 83252 | $32,347 |
| 5 | Peoa River Valley Ranch LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $24,340 |
| 6 | Timothy D Keller | Stone, ID 83252 | $22,152 |
| 7 | Corbridge Bros | Malad City, ID 83252 | $20,756 |
| 8 | Potter Ranches LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $18,428 |
| 9 | Jess Showell | Stone, ID 83252 | $18,387 |
| 10 | Park Family Trust Max & Noreen Park | Malad City, ID 83252 | $17,871 |
| 11 | R & V Neal Ranches Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $17,809 |
| 12 | Max C Firth | Malad City, ID 83252 | $16,718 |
| 13 | David Richards | Malad City, ID 83252 | $16,561 |
| 14 | J Thomas Palmer | Malad City, ID 83252 | $15,889 |
| 15 | Hubbard Land & Lvstk | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $14,892 |
| 16 | Dredge & Son | Malad City, ID 83252 | $14,671 |
| 17 | Davis Farm Limited | Malad City, ID 83252 | $14,333 |
| 18 | David P Jones Jr | Malad City, ID 83252 | $14,315 |
| 19 | Ronald Skidmore | Malad City, ID 83252 | $13,445 |
| 20 | Gale Neal | Malad City, ID 83252 | $12,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf