Total Commodity Programs in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,064
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $48,346,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rushton Farms LLC | Magna, UT 84044 | $1,094,715 |
2 | Hubbard Land & Lvstk | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $1,082,527 |
3 | Lee Ann Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $909,896 |
4 | Brad Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $904,876 |
5 | Robert D Sorensen | Malad City, ID 83252 | $767,496 |
6 | Bert R Marble | Malad City, ID 83252 | $684,860 |
7 | Curlew Development Inc | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $659,334 |
8 | Hansen's Grain Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $657,751 |
9 | Ngw Ranch LLC | Ogden, UT 84409 | $621,215 |
10 | Wright Brothers Ranches L L C | Malad City, ID 83252 | $593,901 |
11 | Wright Bros Partnership | Malad City, ID 83252 | $584,236 |
12 | Simpsons S Bar S LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $572,745 |
13 | Fuhriman Farms LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $559,869 |
14 | Flying R Trust | Malad City, ID 83252 | $503,387 |
15 | Mountain West Select Inc | Idaho Falls, ID 83403 | $484,216 |
16 | Gale Wight | Findlay, OH 45840 | $481,540 |
17 | Lou Ann Thomas | Malad City, ID 83252 | $478,169 |
18 | Richard Hupp | Garland, UT 84312 | $473,579 |
19 | Denton C John | Portage, UT 84331 | $450,918 |
20 | Buehlers Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $440,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>