Loan Deficiency in Twin Falls County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,620
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Twin Falls County, Idaho totaled $15,334,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | W T Williams Inc | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $123,184 |
22 | Beta Western Corp | Malta, ID 83342 | $109,279 |
23 | Hollifield Ranches | Hansen, ID 83334 | $105,404 |
24 | John Gomez | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $98,040 |
25 | Lanting Ent | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $95,666 |
26 | Glenn E Meyer | Filer, ID 83328 | $95,535 |
27 | Craig Giles | Hansen, ID 83334 | $92,998 |
28 | Karl Joslin | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $81,876 |
29 | Randy Brown | Murtaugh, ID 83344 | $75,045 |
30 | Rgb Farms | Hagerman, ID 83332 | $74,753 |
31 | Driscoll Brothers | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $70,416 |
32 | Francisco Villalobos | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $69,805 |
33 | Terry G Hollifield | Hansen, ID 83334 | $69,126 |
34 | White Cloud Land & Cattle Inc | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $68,144 |
35 | Larry Meyer | Filer, ID 83328 | $66,451 |
36 | Don J Norris | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $65,983 |
37 | Tews Land & Livestock Inc | Filer, ID 83328 | $65,740 |
38 | Kimberly Joslin | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $64,683 |
39 | Mark Potter | Gooding, ID 83330 | $63,694 |
40 | Matt Nail | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $59,900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”