Total Commodity Programs in Illinois, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 82,124
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Illinois totaled $1,464,000,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $3,963,145 |
| 2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,208,393 |
| 3 | D Dowson Fms | Pawnee, IL 62558 | $1,140,482 |
| 4 | Herrmann Farms | Hinckley, IL 60520 | $1,114,492 |
| 5 | Sam Beetz & Sons | Mendota, IL 61342 | $1,099,412 |
| 6 | Jenks Family Farms | Monmouth, IL 61462 | $1,025,558 |
| 7 | Bigham Farms | Vergennes, IL 62994 | $1,013,489 |
| 8 | Dawson Farms General Ptrp | Decatur, IL 62521 | $1,000,000 |
| 9 | Agricultural Services Company | De Land, IL 61839 | $986,707 |
| 10 | Lee Farms General Ptr | Paxton, IL 60957 | $947,889 |
| 11 | Campbell Farms | Carmi, IL 62821 | $931,611 |
| 12 | Stewart Farms Partnership | Yorkville, IL 60560 | $871,118 |
| 13 | Carroll Family Farms Partnership | Carthage, IL 62321 | $850,549 |
| 14 | Holmes Farms Gp | New Holland, IL 62671 | $825,462 |
| 15 | Glazik Farms | Paxton, IL 60957 | $797,896 |
| 16 | Kieser Farms Partnership | Mc Lean, IL 61754 | $786,577 |
| 17 | Heritage Family Farms | Arthur, IL 61911 | $760,641 |
| 18 | Dunteman Ag Partners | Kaneville, IL 60144 | $718,729 |
| 19 | Howard Bros Farms | Junction, IL 62954 | $708,994 |
| 20 | Prairieland Farms | Divernon, IL 62530 | $698,051 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf