Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Kane County, Illinois, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 69
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Kane County, Illinois totaled $109,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Scott & Son Cattle Inc | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $11,381 |
2 | Robert C Miller | Orangeville, IL 61060 | $4,730 |
3 | Kenyon Brothers Company | South Elgin, IL 60177 | $4,604 |
4 | Matthew L Engel | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $4,183 |
5 | Michael Klotz | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $3,690 |
6 | Gregory Klotz | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $3,690 |
7 | Edward A Cox Jr | Oak Brook, IL 60523 | $3,564 |
8 | William O'donnell | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $3,564 |
9 | Daneire Farms II | Elburn, IL 60119 | $3,497 |
10 | Herrmann Ag Corp | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $3,474 |
11 | Dennis L Engel | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $3,346 |
12 | Rollin Shaw | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $2,997 |
13 | Daniel W Heinrich | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $2,975 |
14 | Sumter Farm Co | Aurora, IL 60506 | $2,923 |
15 | John Weidner | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $2,871 |
16 | Mark F Schramer | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $2,797 |
17 | Lester Henry Granart | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $2,660 |
18 | Michael Wiesbrock | St Charles, IL 60174 | $2,592 |
19 | Thomas Kohley | Marengo, IL 60152 | $2,588 |
20 | Timothy Van Acker | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $2,480 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>