Market Loss Assistance Program in Wabash County, Illinois, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 828
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Wabash County, Illinois totaled $6,716,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stevens Farms | Allendale, IL 62410 | $213,904 |
2 | Baumgart Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $197,636 |
3 | Allen E Broster | West Salem, IL 62476 | $120,761 |
4 | Chris & John F Dunkel Partners | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $117,630 |
5 | Trapp Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $114,709 |
6 | Kevin Raber Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $114,595 |
7 | John Haase | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $102,419 |
8 | Alka Farms % Bob Alka | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $101,644 |
9 | Charles Tennis | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $97,341 |
10 | G E Buchanan Farms | Allendale, IL 62410 | $93,224 |
11 | Level Acres Inc | West Salem, IL 62476 | $93,218 |
12 | Stephen E Tombaugh | Allendale, IL 62410 | $90,724 |
13 | Pleasant View Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $88,210 |
14 | Tri County Farms | Saint Francisville, IL 62460 | $87,812 |
15 | Hocking Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $86,060 |
16 | Larry G Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $84,757 |
17 | Dan Strine Farms Inc | West Salem, IL 62476 | $81,386 |
18 | Slr Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $80,990 |
19 | Robert Haase Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $80,223 |
20 | Highland Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $77,516 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>