Farm Subsidy information
Indiana
Total Subsidies in Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 48,499
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Indiana totaled $1,008,000,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $10,703,469 |
2 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $4,035,351 |
3 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $3,416,191 |
4 | Walker Place | Danville, IL 61832 | $1,962,584 |
5 | First Farmers Bank & Trust ** | Veedersburg, IN 47987 | $1,447,994 |
6 | Wright Agri Group Gp | Covington, IN 47932 | $1,354,600 |
7 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,311,390 |
8 | Crossroad Farms | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $960,213 |
9 | Armes Grain & Livestock | Washington, IN 47501 | $846,126 |
10 | Jackson Farms | Lebanon, IN 46052 | $799,550 |
11 | Tom Farms Partners | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $790,334 |
12 | Bowman Farms | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $716,680 |
13 | The Bath State Bank ** | Bath, IN 47010 | $707,415 |
14 | Kline Family Farms Partnership | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $705,243 |
15 | Pathway Family Farms | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $694,938 |
16 | Anson Family Farms | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $658,153 |
17 | Hageman Farms Partnership | Remington, IN 47977 | $653,690 |
18 | Suiter Farms Partnership | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $633,837 |
19 | Ag Production Ent Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $627,123 |
20 | Stoy Farms | Ashley, IN 46705 | $609,518 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>