Farm Subsidy information
Indiana
Total Subsidies in Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48,499
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Indiana totaled $1,008,000,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Neese Farms | Frankton, IN 46044 | $608,441 |
22 | Lee Farms | Salem, IN 47167 | $606,542 |
23 | Jones Farms II | Palmyra, IN 47164 | $603,308 |
24 | L&h Wischmeier General Partnership | Columbus, IN 47201 | $601,262 |
25 | First Financial Bank ** | Lafayette, IN 47909 | $598,484 |
26 | Buchanan Farms Partnership | Fowler, IN 47944 | $584,988 |
27 | R & B Kuhn Farms | Morristown, IN 46161 | $544,431 |
28 | Huffer & Huffer | Cutler, IN 46920 | $513,834 |
29 | Jb And Paula K Chapman Part | Middletown, IN 47356 | $503,226 |
30 | Allyn G P, Dba Allyn Farming Company | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $493,937 |
31 | Graham Creek Farms | Commiskey, IN 47227 | $477,755 |
32 | Scott Farms Family Partnership | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $464,129 |
33 | Seng Bros | Dubois, IN 47527 | $462,660 |
34 | Wci Family Farms | Crawfordsville, IN 47933 | $459,459 |
35 | Doerstler Farms | Greens Fork, IN 47345 | $453,376 |
36 | Consolidated Acres | Camden, IN 46917 | $452,418 |
37 | Fansler Farms General Partnership | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $452,294 |
38 | Ternet Farms Partnership | New Haven, IN 46774 | $447,874 |
39 | Gelfius Farms Partnership | Hartsville, IN 47244 | $447,251 |
40 | White Oak Farms | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $446,802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”