Total Commodity Programs in Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 37,994
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Indiana totaled $762,388,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Neese Farms | Frankton, IN 46044 | $608,441 |
22 | Jones Farms II | Palmyra, IN 47164 | $603,308 |
23 | Lee Farms | Salem, IN 47167 | $603,062 |
24 | First Financial Bank ** | Lafayette, IN 47909 | $598,484 |
25 | L&h Wischmeier General Partnership | Columbus, IN 47201 | $587,302 |
26 | Buchanan Farms Partnership | Fowler, IN 47944 | $567,294 |
27 | R & B Kuhn Farms | Morristown, IN 46161 | $542,156 |
28 | Huffer & Huffer | Cutler, IN 46920 | $513,834 |
29 | Jb And Paula K Chapman Part | Middletown, IN 47356 | $503,226 |
30 | Allyn G P, Dba Allyn Farming Company | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $493,937 |
31 | Graham Creek Farms | Commiskey, IN 47227 | $477,755 |
32 | Scott Farms Family Partnership | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $464,129 |
33 | Seng Bros | Dubois, IN 47527 | $457,146 |
34 | Consolidated Acres | Camden, IN 46917 | $451,338 |
35 | Fansler Farms General Partnership | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $450,360 |
36 | Ternet Farms Partnership | New Haven, IN 46774 | $446,590 |
37 | Wci Family Farms | Crawfordsville, IN 47933 | $445,729 |
38 | Gelfius Farms Partnership | Hartsville, IN 47244 | $445,619 |
39 | White Oak Farms | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $443,546 |
40 | Doerstler Farms | Greens Fork, IN 47345 | $442,609 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”