Farm Subsidy information
Allen County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Allen County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,838
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Allen County, Indiana totaled $237,148,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bacon Bros Farms | New Haven, IN 46774 | $2,229,592 |
2 | Rosene Farms Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $2,147,599 |
3 | Rex E Coomer | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $1,781,793 |
4 | Michael Lomont | New Haven, IN 46774 | $1,542,215 |
5 | J Malfait Farms Inc | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $1,468,590 |
6 | Bowers Bros Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $1,465,216 |
7 | Ternet Farms Partnership | New Haven, IN 46774 | $1,414,158 |
8 | Timothy Rorick | New Haven, IN 46774 | $1,394,540 |
9 | Schaefer Inc | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $1,338,579 |
10 | Lori Ann Melcher | New Haven, IN 46774 | $1,313,967 |
11 | Coomer Bros | New Haven, IN 46774 | $1,276,256 |
12 | Danny L Bremer | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $1,272,817 |
13 | Brian Salomon | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $1,220,839 |
14 | O'shaughnessey Farms Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $1,178,751 |
15 | Kuehnert Dairy Inc | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $1,059,429 |
16 | Ralph A Kurtz | New Haven, IN 46774 | $1,038,747 |
17 | Rosene Agri-transport Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $1,023,163 |
18 | Ellis Mcfadden | Fort Wayne, IN 46819 | $1,017,647 |
19 | David N Wilson | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $982,926 |
20 | Roemke Farms | Harlan, IN 46743 | $981,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>