Conservation Reserve Program in Allen County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,461
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Allen County, Indiana totaled $18,371,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Madelyn Reichhart | Hoagland, IN 46745 | $107,168 |
22 | Kees Grain Farms | Harlan, IN 46743 | $100,500 |
23 | John Mcnamara | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $95,609 |
24 | Cjmg LLC | Fort Wayne, IN 46825 | $95,417 |
25 | Robert L Jones | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $94,758 |
26 | Roy S Dale | Fort Wayne, IN 46809 | $94,157 |
27 | Marilyn L Maloney | Fort Wayne, IN 46845 | $93,853 |
28 | Richard Burton | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $91,550 |
29 | Bob Bruns | Fort Wayne, IN 46814 | $89,708 |
30 | Cedar Creek Farms Inc | Fort Wayne, IN 46845 | $89,658 |
31 | The Dafforn Estate Revocable Trust | Henderson, NV 89012 | $87,358 |
32 | Kenneth Lawson | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $87,294 |
33 | Gerald W Sorg Rev Trust | Fort Wayne, IN 46816 | $86,191 |
34 | City Of Fort Wayne | Fort Wayne, IN 46802 | $85,312 |
35 | Ronald J Ehinger | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $80,693 |
36 | Donald Holm | Leo, IN 46765 | $78,980 |
37 | Paramajit S Dhillon | Fort Wayne, IN 46802 | $78,884 |
38 | Raymond L Sylvester | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $76,198 |
39 | Omo Farms | Harlan, IN 46743 | $75,292 |
40 | Rex Wells | Leo, IN 46765 | $74,895 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”