Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in De Kalb County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 48
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in De Kalb County, Indiana totaled $1,172,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Walker Farms Gp | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $271,639 |
2 | Brechbill Farms Inc | Auburn, IN 46706 | $115,729 |
3 | Ivan Buckmaster & Sons Inc | Ashley, IN 46705 | $89,116 |
4 | Haynes Dairy Farm Inc | Garrett, IN 46738 | $67,620 |
5 | Moughler Brothers Inc | Butler, IN 46721 | $66,547 |
6 | Kelham Farms Inc | Avilla, IN 46710 | $60,226 |
7 | Don Hook Farms Inc | Butler, IN 46721 | $56,589 |
8 | Phe LLC | Garrett, IN 46738 | $53,334 |
9 | Kummer Farms LLC | Auburn, IN 46706 | $30,544 |
10 | Steven James Kelham Dba Sjk Farms | Avilla, IN 46710 | $28,108 |
11 | James Robert Cather | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $24,811 |
12 | Krehl Farms Inc | Kendallville, IN 46755 | $24,401 |
13 | Troyer Meadows Inc | Ashley, IN 46705 | $24,384 |
14 | Grate & Sons Dairy Farm Inc | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $22,726 |
15 | Gary Weilbaker | Fort Wayne, IN 46825 | $20,398 |
16 | James Anthony Miller | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $20,007 |
17 | James Deetz | Wolcottville, IN 46795 | $19,227 |
18 | Jerry Forrest | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $15,921 |
19 | Ed Baatz | Auburn, IN 46706 | $14,086 |
20 | Dennis L Zeisloft | Auburn, IN 46706 | $12,959 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>