Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in De Kalb County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 649
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in De Kalb County, Indiana totaled $9,519,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Custer Farms Inc | Garrett, IN 46738 | $97,154 |
22 | George Brand | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $96,730 |
23 | Laub Farms LLC | Saint Joe, IN 46785 | $96,530 |
24 | Todd A Goings | Auburn, IN 46706 | $94,782 |
25 | Kelham Farms Inc | Avilla, IN 46710 | $93,283 |
26 | Kummer Farms LLC | Auburn, IN 46706 | $92,165 |
27 | James L Smyth | Butler, IN 46721 | $92,087 |
28 | Phe LLC | Garrett, IN 46738 | $88,288 |
29 | Brian Scott Clifford | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $84,538 |
30 | H & H Farms Of Dekalb County LLC | Auburn, IN 46706 | $82,702 |
31 | James Robert Cather | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $78,664 |
32 | J&m Smith Farms LLC | Butler, IN 46721 | $75,896 |
33 | Douglas Houser | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $74,370 |
34 | Stoy Farms | Ashley, IN 46705 | $72,285 |
35 | Randy Provines | Butler, IN 46721 | $71,262 |
36 | Daniel L Fry | Butler, IN 46721 | $71,062 |
37 | Sugar Ridge Farms LLC | Saint Joe, IN 46785 | $69,738 |
38 | Thomas Lee Keller | Butler, IN 46721 | $69,523 |
39 | David L Walters | Auburn, IN 46706 | $68,861 |
40 | Long Lane Farms Inc | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $68,568 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”