Farm Subsidy information
Gibson County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Gibson County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,062
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gibson County, Indiana totaled $28,937,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Frey Brothers | Keenes, IL 62851 | $1,825,772 |
2 | Pathway Family Farms | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $1,342,522 |
3 | New Generation Dairy | Owensville, IN 47665 | $965,093 |
4 | Obert Farms Inc | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $829,633 |
5 | Bingham Farms | Patoka, IN 47666 | $342,702 |
6 | Ziliak Enterprises | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $312,321 |
7 | Robert Haase Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $311,324 |
8 | Gibson County Grain Inc | Owensville, IN 47665 | $271,712 |
9 | David L Haase Revocable Trust | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $253,723 |
10 | Schmitt Farms | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $248,743 |
11 | Kihi Farms Inc | Princeton, IN 47670 | $240,935 |
12 | Mcconnell Farms LLC | Princeton, IN 47670 | $239,549 |
13 | Joseph W Kissel | Princeton, IN 47670 | $236,024 |
14 | Jacqueline Haase Revocable Trust | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $231,470 |
15 | Melvin Raye Ziliak | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $230,553 |
16 | Steelman Farms Inc | Patoka, IN 47666 | $229,995 |
17 | Jay Sensmeier | Owensville, IN 47665 | $227,477 |
18 | S & L Farms LLC | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $224,550 |
19 | Brian A Douglas | Princeton, IN 47670 | $222,712 |
20 | Alan Sensmeier Farms Inc | Owensville, IN 47665 | $217,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>