SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Gibson County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 78
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Gibson County, Indiana totaled $1,925,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bingham Farms | Patoka, IN 47666 | $437,844 |
2 | Stephen W Marvel | Princeton, IN 47670 | $230,260 |
3 | Maple Land Co LLC | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $124,833 |
4 | Ziliak Land Incorporated | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $122,165 |
5 | Robert Haase Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $100,000 |
6 | Ronald D Hudson | Patoka, IN 47666 | $90,983 |
7 | Wm Clark Bugher | Patoka, IN 47666 | $83,599 |
8 | David L Haase Revocable Trust | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $77,035 |
9 | Ronald W Miley | Francisco, IN 47649 | $51,890 |
10 | Don Pflug Farms Inc | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $36,912 |
11 | Don E Hulfachor | Patoka, IN 47666 | $31,173 |
12 | Edward D Horrall | Patoka, IN 47666 | $29,681 |
13 | Donald E Hale | Owensville, IN 47665 | $29,354 |
14 | Ziliak Land Inc | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $29,205 |
15 | Kenneth W Page | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $26,265 |
16 | Judith Kae Page | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $26,066 |
17 | Bjk Farms LLC | Francisco, IN 47649 | $22,988 |
18 | James D Key Revocable Trust | Patoka, IN 47666 | $22,778 |
19 | Jacqueline Haase Revocable Trust | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $21,175 |
20 | Mark Allen Naas | Cynthiana, IN 47612 | $20,974 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>