Farm Subsidy information
Hamilton County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Hamilton County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,685
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hamilton County, Indiana totaled $122,078,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J & M House Farms Inc | Elwood, IN 46036 | $798,684 |
22 | M & M House Farms Inc | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $797,644 |
23 | Michael Kent Henderson | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $757,697 |
24 | Arthur L Johnson | Fishers, IN 46037 | $721,292 |
25 | Philip N Etchison | Arcadia, IN 46030 | $625,762 |
26 | Robert E Cruzan II | Arcadia, IN 46030 | $597,751 |
27 | Philip Henderson | Arcadia, IN 46030 | $593,976 |
28 | Golden Sunrise Farms Inc | Noblesville, IN 46060 | $575,782 |
29 | High Lawn Farms Inc | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $563,978 |
30 | William J Davis | Sheridan, IN 46069 | $560,329 |
31 | Joseph L Miller | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $559,869 |
32 | Roger Stewart | Kirklin, IN 46050 | $545,451 |
33 | Larry Ogle | Sheridan, IN 46069 | $529,743 |
34 | Boone Farms Inc | Noblesville, IN 46060 | $526,502 |
35 | Kirby Farms Inc | Sheridan, IN 46069 | $525,024 |
36 | Kristin Kay Johnson | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $524,080 |
37 | Neil Alan Johnson | Sheridan, IN 46069 | $519,491 |
38 | B & J Anderson Fms Ltd | Lapel, IN 46051 | $516,890 |
39 | Lavonne M Etchison | Arcadia, IN 46030 | $498,462 |
40 | Zeller Farms LLC | Noblesville, IN 46060 | $470,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”