Total Commodity Programs in Knox County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,342
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Knox County, Indiana totaled $254,138,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brocksmith Farms | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $3,846,609 |
2 | Anson Family Farms | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $2,698,745 |
3 | Llss | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $2,688,033 |
4 | Jmr Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $2,375,162 |
5 | Anson Farms | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $2,294,047 |
6 | Cypress Farms | Bruceville, IN 47516 | $2,207,936 |
7 | W Lowell Carnahan & Sons Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $2,039,779 |
8 | Maurice Vieck & Sons Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $1,905,947 |
9 | Ronald Small | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $1,830,854 |
10 | Dinkens Farms Inc | Edwardsport, IN 47528 | $1,825,199 |
11 | Harry Kerns Farms Inc | Wheatland, IN 47597 | $1,810,997 |
12 | Newton Farms Inc | Bruceville, IN 47516 | $1,763,765 |
13 | Carolyn J Small | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $1,731,823 |
14 | Huey Enterprises Inc | Sandborn, IN 47578 | $1,714,788 |
15 | Franklin Thomas & Sons Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $1,695,636 |
16 | L & R Rusch Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $1,626,481 |
17 | Ernest Miller & Sons | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $1,618,653 |
18 | Mcclure Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $1,584,335 |
19 | Gary M Holscher | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $1,576,602 |
20 | Billy G Williams | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $1,564,636 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>