Farm Subsidy information
La Porte County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in La Porte County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 855
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in La Porte County, Indiana totaled $25,318,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Triple M Dairy LLC | Laporte, IN 46350 | $765,183 |
2 | Minich Dairy Farm | La Porte, IN 46350 | $638,343 |
3 | Paarlberg Farms | Rolling Prairie, IN 46371 | $432,455 |
4 | Rick A Welsh | Topeka, IN 46571 | $431,751 |
5 | Abbett Farms LLC | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $423,747 |
6 | Eko Acres Farms LLC | La Porte, IN 46350 | $417,440 |
7 | Ru-barb Holsteins Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $403,676 |
8 | Wykoff Bros Farms Inc | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $353,215 |
9 | Bannwart Farms Inc | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $316,283 |
10 | Baltes Farms LLC | Rolling Prairie, IN 46371 | $311,909 |
11 | Schafer Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $301,518 |
12 | Garwood Orchards Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $270,694 |
13 | Gorski Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $258,882 |
14 | Gamble Dairy LLC | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $232,908 |
15 | Jesswein Operating LLC | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $224,049 |
16 | Gregory A Smoker | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $216,030 |
17 | Michael J Vanwanzeele | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $211,957 |
18 | Tom Peeples | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $205,173 |
19 | Rice Farms LLC | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $199,896 |
20 | Koehn Farms Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $198,455 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>