Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Pike County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 464
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Pike County, Indiana totaled $7,649,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Frederick & Sons Farms LLC | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $84,775 |
22 | Robert H Weitkamp II | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $83,679 |
23 | Burke Construction Co | Wheatland, IN 47597 | $79,601 |
24 | Larry Kruse | Princeton, IN 47670 | $72,947 |
25 | Gressland Farms Inc | Velpen, IN 47590 | $72,596 |
26 | Weisman Farms Inc | Otwell, IN 47564 | $72,144 |
27 | Davidson Farms | Hazleton, IN 47640 | $64,955 |
28 | Hudson Farms LLC | Winslow, IN 47598 | $64,160 |
29 | Brad A Wehr | Jasper, IN 47546 | $63,541 |
30 | Mill Creek Farms | Jasper, IN 47546 | $63,457 |
31 | Hoffman Farms LLC | Jasper, IN 47546 | $61,771 |
32 | Michael A Ison | Greenwood, IN 46143 | $61,624 |
33 | Charles Keith Breidenbaugh | Otwell, IN 47564 | $58,868 |
34 | Brittingham Farms Inc | Francisco, IN 47649 | $58,010 |
35 | Steven M Meyer | Otwell, IN 47564 | $53,673 |
36 | Joshua D Collins | Hazleton, IN 47640 | $53,293 |
37 | Larry F Kolb | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $52,910 |
38 | Daryl Schmitt | Jasper, IN 47546 | $51,950 |
39 | Neal Pauw | Winslow, IN 47598 | $51,626 |
40 | Eugene R Schmitt | Jasper, IN 47546 | $47,999 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”