Loan Deficiency in Posey County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,765
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Posey County, Indiana totaled $34,105,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harold C Bender Farm | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $496,170 |
| 2 | Kern Farms | Griffin, IN 47616 | $421,377 |
| 3 | Seibert Bros Inc | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $412,906 |
| 4 | Reineke Farms %steve Reineke | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $405,992 |
| 5 | Hoehn Farms Inc | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $397,822 |
| 6 | U & S Farms | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $395,048 |
| 7 | Joseph K Eisterhold | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $370,611 |
| 8 | Prime Time Production Inc | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $369,473 |
| 9 | Wiley Bros Farms Inc | New Harmony, IN 47631 | $369,447 |
| 10 | Naab Seeds Inc | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $363,112 |
| 11 | Franklin J Bender | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $354,759 |
| 12 | Beuligmann Farms Inc | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $347,829 |
| 13 | Beuligmann Bros | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $332,809 |
| 14 | Seib Farms | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $315,613 |
| 15 | Pro Ag Inc | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $306,839 |
| 16 | Simpson Bros | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $301,874 |
| 17 | Kaufman Farms Inc | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $269,954 |
| 18 | Terry Mahrenholz | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $269,769 |
| 19 | Ivan Bender Farms Inc | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $267,101 |
| 20 | Robert R Guenther | New Harmony, IN 47631 | $257,577 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf