Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Putnam County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 605
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Putnam County, Indiana totaled $10,732,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ray W Poynter | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $93,666 |
22 | E A & J Cantonwine Inc | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $92,270 |
23 | Donald W Boller | Coatesville, IN 46121 | $90,888 |
24 | Merlin Martin | Clayton, IN 46118 | $89,333 |
25 | Rick Knowling | Roachdale, IN 46172 | $87,185 |
26 | Kenneth Shupe | Stilesville, IN 46180 | $87,116 |
27 | Todd Shupe | Stilesville, IN 46180 | $85,804 |
28 | J & K Small Farms LLC | Ladoga, IN 47954 | $84,020 |
29 | Britton Farms Inc | Louisville, KY 40299 | $81,215 |
30 | Shane A Wilson | Bainbridge, IN 46105 | $79,498 |
31 | Kent Brattain | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $79,072 |
32 | Legan Livestock & Grain Inc | Coatesville, IN 46121 | $79,063 |
33 | Kevin W Jones | Roachdale, IN 46172 | $78,454 |
34 | David Rowings | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $77,630 |
35 | Keith Berry | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $77,276 |
36 | Steve Greeson | Coatesville, IN 46121 | $76,638 |
37 | Mike And Jeff Buis Partnership | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $76,465 |
38 | Corbin Family Farms LLC | Ladoga, IN 47954 | $69,123 |
39 | Gilbert Jack Berry | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $67,057 |
40 | Graze Bend Farms | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $66,594 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”