Farm Subsidy information
Randolph County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Randolph County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 767
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Randolph County, Indiana totaled $16,121,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wayne Fisher Farms Inc | Union City, IN 47390 | $201,713 |
2 | Todd A Smithson | Farmland, IN 47340 | $190,114 |
3 | Gary Foulke | Winchester, IN 47394 | $184,564 |
4 | Merchants Bank Of Indiana ** | Lynn, IN 47355 | $175,992 |
5 | Shon Knoll | Lynn, IN 47355 | $167,737 |
6 | D&d Hill Farms LLC | Winchester, IN 47394 | $159,217 |
7 | Cassel Farms Inc | Parker City, IN 47368 | $150,985 |
8 | Joel D Flesher | Ridgeville, IN 47380 | $144,905 |
9 | Douglas Landon Smith | Parker City, IN 47368 | $139,264 |
10 | Chalfant Brothers Row Crop LLC | Winchester, IN 47394 | $128,378 |
11 | Lefevre Family Enterprises Ltd | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $124,329 |
12 | Jerry Warren | Union City, IN 47390 | $123,293 |
13 | Sandra Retter | Lynn, IN 47355 | $122,606 |
14 | Eric A Bentz | Union City, IN 47390 | $116,297 |
15 | Matthew J Dirksen | Winchester, IN 47394 | $115,175 |
16 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $112,619 |
17 | Union Go Dairy LLC | Winchester, IN 47394 | $112,516 |
18 | Clifford G Coulter | Parker City, IN 47368 | $107,332 |
19 | Groth Farms Inc | Winchester, IN 47394 | $106,323 |
20 | Michael K Alka | Winchester, IN 47394 | $104,539 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>