Farm Subsidy information
Rush County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Rush County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 628
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rush County, Indiana totaled $20,132,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $715,128 |
2 | Fansler Farms General Partnership | Shelbyville, IN 46176 | $447,510 |
3 | Rush County Feed, LLC | Rushville, IN 46173 | $375,758 |
4 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $344,928 |
5 | Hoeing Livestock Farms Inc | Rushville, IN 46173 | $318,099 |
6 | Stephen Osborne | Rushville, IN 46173 | $242,649 |
7 | Michael Cassidy | Waldron, IN 46182 | $191,717 |
8 | Robert J Hurst | Waldron, IN 46182 | $182,577 |
9 | Fussner Farms | Rushville, IN 46173 | $178,292 |
10 | Ripberger Farms Inc | Falmouth, IN 46127 | $176,015 |
11 | John Busald Farm Inc | Rushville, IN 46173 | $158,371 |
12 | Wcsgrain LLC | Rushville, IN 46173 | $158,360 |
13 | Andrew R Dora | Rushville, IN 46173 | $153,972 |
14 | Nicole E Dora | Rushville, IN 46173 | $153,972 |
15 | Kevin Geise | Rushville, IN 46173 | $150,767 |
16 | M & M Grain Farms Inc | Rushville, IN 46173 | $136,956 |
17 | A Team Farms Inc | Milroy, IN 46156 | $135,092 |
18 | David A Truster | Rushville, IN 46173 | $133,863 |
19 | Kuhn Enterprises Inc | Manilla, IN 46150 | $127,948 |
20 | Charles Fogg | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $125,059 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>