Farm Subsidy information
Vigo County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Vigo County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,032
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $9,354,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jacks Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $226,937 |
2 | Kurt Hamilton | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $211,902 |
3 | Randall J Welsh | Dennison, IL 62423 | $206,862 |
4 | Sporer Farm Management Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $206,747 |
5 | Be-n-ag LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $185,728 |
6 | Terremax Farms LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $173,129 |
7 | Brad A Cooper | Dennison, IL 62423 | $157,552 |
8 | W&j Harlan Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $156,685 |
9 | Irwin Farms Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $142,998 |
10 | J M Campbell Farms Inc | Pimento, IN 47866 | $142,621 |
11 | Hansel Seed Company Inc | Paris, IL 61944 | $139,240 |
12 | Fl Wilson Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $120,875 |
13 | Caton & Ruppel Farms LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $110,068 |
14 | Larry J Turner | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $106,304 |
15 | Hayhurst Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $106,077 |
16 | Samuel R Plant | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $103,566 |
17 | Felling Farm LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $98,649 |
18 | Woodsmall Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $96,666 |
19 | E & M Farms | Clinton, IN 47842 | $93,346 |
20 | Brent Randall Hults | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $91,662 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>