Conservation Reserve Program in Vigo County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 95
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $392,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Klug Farms LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $48,104 |
2 | Fl Wilson Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $42,518 |
3 | Carter Farms Inc | Lewis, IN 47858 | $39,326 |
4 | Burch Harlan Co Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $32,553 |
5 | George Higginbotham | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $23,889 |
6 | Sisters Of Providence | Saint Mary Of The Wo, IN 47876 | $21,951 |
7 | North River Bottom And Russell | Jersey City, NJ 07302 | $15,471 |
8 | Jack L Ross Revocable Trust | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $14,192 |
9 | D & C Farmer Farms LLC | Flower Mound, TX 75028 | $9,836 |
10 | Don Hooker | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $8,449 |
11 | C-t Farms LLC | Clinton, IN 47842 | $8,411 |
12 | Anna M Wilson | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $8,265 |
13 | Kenneth A Amos Living Trust | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $7,586 |
14 | Felling Farm LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $7,403 |
15 | Thunderstate LLC | Spencer, IN 47460 | $6,372 |
16 | James O Mcdonald | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $6,001 |
17 | Irwin Farms Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $5,737 |
18 | Harley E Mcdonald Jr | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $5,460 |
19 | Charles E Freeman | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $5,352 |
20 | Gary P Walker | Paris, IL 61944 | $4,332 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>