Total Commodity Programs in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,187
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $89,644,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | W&j Harlan Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,832,621 |
2 | Be-n-ag LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,796,894 |
3 | Burch Harlan Co Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,689,959 |
4 | J M Campbell Farms Inc | Pimento, IN 47866 | $1,689,509 |
5 | Larry J Turner | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $1,317,184 |
6 | Irwin Farms Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $1,249,668 |
7 | Larry Burnett | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,238,655 |
8 | Fl Wilson Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,126,210 |
9 | Floyd Lloyd & Earl Lenderman Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $1,114,929 |
10 | Woodsmall Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,083,777 |
11 | Brad A Cooper | Dennison, IL 62423 | $1,064,893 |
12 | Ronald Lamb | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $1,046,075 |
13 | Sporer Farm Management Inc | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $1,013,416 |
14 | Hayhurst Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $985,508 |
15 | Roger Sturgeon | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $984,114 |
16 | Randy Miller | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $815,960 |
17 | E & M Farms | Clinton, IN 47842 | $809,012 |
18 | Kurt Hamilton | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $798,038 |
19 | Randall J Welsh | Dennison, IL 62423 | $788,290 |
20 | Hartmann Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $776,486 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>