Farm Subsidy information
Whitley County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Whitley County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 587
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $11,305,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shady Grove Farms Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $298,297 |
| 2 | South View Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $272,810 |
| 3 | Molly Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $257,600 |
| 4 | Cory Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $235,593 |
| 5 | Stetzel Farms Inc | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $227,022 |
| 6 | Dan Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $145,797 |
| 7 | Juillerat Farms Incorporated | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $143,884 |
| 8 | Richard Cox | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $143,241 |
| 9 | Pg Frazier Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $142,519 |
| 10 | Jeffery L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $141,978 |
| 11 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $133,691 |
| 12 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $133,555 |
| 13 | Cormany Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $127,824 |
| 14 | Sonrise Pork LLC | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $125,000 |
| 15 | Douglas L Schrader | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $115,766 |
| 16 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $114,328 |
| 17 | D & R Farms And Sons, LLC | Larwill, IN 46764 | $108,681 |
| 18 | Kevin E Bollinger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $107,334 |
| 19 | Brent Drew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $106,696 |
| 20 | James T Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $97,224 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf