Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 89
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $1,748,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | More Family Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $85,266 |
| 2 | George Frazier Marital Trust | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $80,798 |
| 3 | Tom Farms Partners | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $80,144 |
| 4 | Juillerat Farms Incorporated | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $78,277 |
| 5 | Stetzel Farms Inc | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $64,128 |
| 6 | Hindbaugh L L C | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $63,666 |
| 7 | Walter Trabert Sr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $60,796 |
| 8 | Stanley Sickafoose | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $59,436 |
| 9 | Johnson Bros Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $57,962 |
| 10 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $54,672 |
| 11 | Harold Copp Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $50,761 |
| 12 | Thomas Henney | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $47,217 |
| 13 | Max E Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $45,255 |
| 14 | Hinen Family Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $44,856 |
| 15 | P Dennis Wolfe | Larwill, IN 46764 | $39,239 |
| 16 | Wait Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $36,527 |
| 17 | Beth Ann Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $35,226 |
| 18 | Dean Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $33,207 |
| 19 | Robert Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $32,262 |
| 20 | Mary Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $32,254 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf