Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 361
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $1,966,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jeffery L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $130,831 |
2 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $90,083 |
3 | Cory Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $89,209 |
4 | Dairy Enterprise LLC | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $78,972 |
5 | D & R Farms And Sons, LLC | Larwill, IN 46764 | $70,886 |
6 | Hoffman Land & Cattle LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $68,369 |
7 | Zumbrun Bros | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $58,529 |
8 | Brent Kyle Emerick | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $44,831 |
9 | Max E Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $41,790 |
10 | Beth Ann Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $39,198 |
11 | Shady Grove Farms Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $33,159 |
12 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $31,639 |
13 | Brent Drew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $31,065 |
14 | Hindbaugh L L C | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $30,834 |
15 | Cormany Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $29,703 |
16 | Tom Farms Partners | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $26,701 |
17 | Dan Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $24,325 |
18 | South View Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $24,097 |
19 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $20,507 |
20 | Molly Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $20,507 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>