Total Commodity Programs in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,541
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $113,586,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shady Grove Farms Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $3,058,586 |
| 2 | Cormany Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $2,337,645 |
| 3 | South View Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $2,223,673 |
| 4 | Hoffman Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,764,025 |
| 5 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,607,175 |
| 6 | Stetzel Farms Inc | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $1,547,811 |
| 7 | Cory Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,471,170 |
| 8 | Stanley Sickafoose | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,422,213 |
| 9 | Juillerat Farms Incorporated | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,313,562 |
| 10 | Jeffery L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,240,018 |
| 11 | Thomas E Western | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,220,040 |
| 12 | More Family Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,180,145 |
| 13 | Dan Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,163,231 |
| 14 | Sonrise Pork LLC | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,153,910 |
| 15 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $1,107,831 |
| 16 | Longville Farms Inc | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $1,096,839 |
| 17 | Molly Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $1,089,804 |
| 18 | Rex A Schipper | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $1,034,670 |
| 19 | Douglas L Schrader | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $996,122 |
| 20 | P Dennis Wolfe | Larwill, IN 46764 | $986,531 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf