Conservation Reserve Program in Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 52,245
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Iowa totaled $380,034,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | United Bank Of Iowa ** | Carroll, IA 51401 | $1,351,906 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $567,374 |
3 | Richland Prtsp | Salix, IA 51052 | $420,320 |
4 | Dejay Farms | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $250,000 |
5 | Cms Partners | Alden, IA 50006 | $193,247 |
6 | Sac & Fox Tribe Of The Mississippi In Iowa | Ames, IA 50010 | $191,759 |
7 | Farm Credit Services Of America ** | Lawton, IA 51030 | $186,587 |
8 | Fish Family Farmers | Minnetonka, MN 55305 | $172,080 |
9 | Hippen Paradise Acres | Aplington, IA 50604 | $166,755 |
10 | First State Bank ** | Stuart, IA 50250 | $150,731 |
11 | Iowa Family Farms | Batavia, IA 52533 | $148,513 |
12 | First National Bank ** | Correctionville, IA 51016 | $129,231 |
13 | Great Plains State Bank ** | Grant City, MO 64456 | $111,771 |
14 | North Shore Four Investments | San Diego, CA 92106 | $101,116 |
15 | Helen R Carlson | Nodaway, IA 50857 | $100,000 |
16 | Miller Bros Farm Partnership | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $99,292 |
17 | Pioneer Bank ** | Salix, IA 51052 | $99,285 |
18 | Audubon State Bank ** | Panora, IA 50216 | $99,278 |
19 | Kahnert Family General Partnership | Blockton, IA 50836 | $99,268 |
20 | Keystone Savings Bank ** | Marengo, IA 52301 | $98,848 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>