Total Conservation Programs in Iowa, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 142,229

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Iowa totaled $6,642,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2021
21Calvin KnowlerSigourney, IA 52591$1,196,315
22Manatt's Enterprises LtdBrooklyn, IA 52211$1,192,567
23James W Schultz Irrevocable TrustDelano, MN 55328$1,178,270
24Ronald PickardFairfield, IA 52556$1,164,933
25The E & F Farm CorporationAtlantic, IA 50022$1,161,895
26Arthur MccreaDelavan, IL 61734$1,138,984
27Clifford Dean CorpmanAinsworth, IA 52201$1,127,912
28Wildlands For The Future LtdMarion, IA 52302$1,124,796
29Jeffrey Soulsby- Jeffrey L Soulsby Rev TrustBedford, IA 50833$1,124,729
30A J M FarmsDuncombe, IA 50532$1,119,794
31James R EvansAurora, IL 60506$1,100,875
32Wagner Farm Lmtd PtnrColumbus Junction, IA 52738$1,099,095
33Philip D Lyon Revocable TrustOttumwa, IA 52501$1,096,787
34James WaterhouseKeota, IA 52248$1,087,768
35Michael J KuceraGarden Grove, IA 50103$1,083,888
36El & Ac Goebel Irrevocable TrustBettendorf, IA 52722$1,083,867
37Frederick Eugene EngelBrighton, IA 52540$1,080,708
38Jack WolfeSan Diego, CA 92127$1,067,291
39David W DudychaCollege Station, TX 77845$1,066,867
40Miller Bros Farm PartnershipIda Grove, IA 51445$1,064,306

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag