Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Calhoun County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 369
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Calhoun County, Iowa totaled $7,031,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Horan Brothers | Manson, IA 50563 | $502,736 |
2 | Green Brothers Inc | Somers, IA 50586 | $136,249 |
3 | L D Five Star Inc | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $135,966 |
4 | Kramland Ltd | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $129,877 |
5 | Seil Farms Inc | Lohrville, IA 51453 | $121,679 |
6 | R & S Block Ptn | Lake City, IA 51449 | $113,309 |
7 | Robert Allen Lowry | Somers, IA 50586 | $113,301 |
8 | Farmers Best Seed & Grain Farms | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $105,484 |
9 | Craig William Hiler | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $104,145 |
10 | Keith Randy Hiler | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $100,944 |
11 | Dennis D Sukovaty | Manson, IA 50563 | $99,445 |
12 | Growing Acres Inc | Manson, IA 50563 | $96,910 |
13 | Strutzenberg Farms Inc | Manson, IA 50563 | $92,795 |
14 | Matthew D Lowry | Somers, IA 50586 | $92,333 |
15 | Gene Dischler | Manson, IA 50563 | $87,447 |
16 | David W Glasnapp | Lytton, IA 50561 | $87,126 |
17 | Gary D Hammen | Jolley, IA 50551 | $83,819 |
18 | Glenn Lynn Wuebker | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $82,504 |
19 | Gary Duane Eichelberger | Manson, IA 50563 | $81,877 |
20 | Keith William Sexton | Rockwell City, IA 50579 | $78,965 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>