Farm Subsidy information
Emmet County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Emmet County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 768
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $17,610,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Scott D Herum | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $158,960 |
2 | Bruce Zebedee | Estherville, IA 51334 | $156,827 |
3 | Guse Family Farm Corporation | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $154,359 |
4 | Mark James Neppel | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $119,696 |
5 | Mcconnell Family Farm Inc | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $119,280 |
6 | Joseph August Klingbeil | Estherville, IA 51334 | $115,114 |
7 | J And J Madden Farms LLC | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $114,325 |
8 | Greig & Co Inc | Estherville, IA 51334 | $113,652 |
9 | Douglas Allen Evans | Terril, IA 51364 | $112,787 |
10 | Linn Lavern Ries | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $111,216 |
11 | Ann Louise Neppel | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $108,751 |
12 | Daniel Lee Nelsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $108,742 |
13 | Roger Melvin Lowe | Estherville, IA 51334 | $106,881 |
14 | Soldier Creek Farm Inc | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $103,754 |
15 | B & J White Farms LLC | Estherville, IA 51334 | $97,652 |
16 | Rick Eggers | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $93,329 |
17 | James Douglas Richard | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $92,739 |
18 | Matthew J Richard | Estherville, IA 51334 | $92,165 |
19 | Ronald Frank Klingbeil | Estherville, IA 51334 | $90,018 |
20 | Gerald Lee Ulrich | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $87,986 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>