Total Commodity Programs in Floyd County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 808
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $26,666,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | H E Trettin Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $1,198,505 |
2 | Mbs Family Farms | Plainfield, IA 50666 | $748,022 |
3 | Bierschenk Farms L C | Nashua, IA 50658 | $375,586 |
4 | Wyborny Farms | Osage, IA 50461 | $374,435 |
5 | John Martin Burkholder | Charles City, IA 50616 | $367,957 |
6 | Jean M Staudt | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $366,848 |
7 | Paul J Staudt | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $352,298 |
8 | Balsam Coop | Sumner, IA 50674 | $319,951 |
9 | Clark R Mcgregor | Nashua, IA 50658 | $271,307 |
10 | Engels Farms Inc | Greene, IA 50636 | $264,652 |
11 | Fox Country Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $257,545 |
12 | Pro Cattle Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $255,665 |
13 | M & A Chambers Farms Corporation | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $185,627 |
14 | Schmitt Bros Ptn | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $180,811 |
15 | Shadow Mead Farm LLC | Charles City, IA 50616 | $180,454 |
16 | Fox Family Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $178,319 |
17 | Oakwood Farms Ptn | Charles City, IA 50616 | $172,507 |
18 | Charles Edward Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $170,488 |
19 | Deanne Kay Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $170,485 |
20 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $168,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>