Emergency Conservation Program in Henry County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 133
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Henry County, Iowa totaled $267,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fitz Farms Ltd | New London, IA 52645 | $16,250 |
2 | Grant Lynn Nebel | Washington, IA 52353 | $11,250 |
3 | E Philip Crawford | Winfield, IA 52659 | $8,883 |
4 | Robison Pork Inc | Brighton, IA 52540 | $8,280 |
5 | Blair Duayne Lehman | New London, IA 52645 | $6,352 |
6 | Larry Joe Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $6,318 |
7 | The R T S Corp | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $6,315 |
8 | Wil-farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $5,844 |
9 | Allen Rich Jr | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $5,715 |
10 | William Crawford | Winfield, IA 52659 | $5,021 |
11 | Laris Eugene Shelman | Winfield, IA 52659 | $4,984 |
12 | Wayne Conrad Meierotto | Salem, IA 52649 | $4,514 |
13 | Richard Duane Gholson | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $4,229 |
14 | K K Ger-son Inc | New London, IA 52645 | $3,994 |
15 | Larry D Anderson | Brighton, IA 52540 | $3,750 |
16 | Paul Rebling | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $3,740 |
17 | Harlan Andrew Miller | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $3,709 |
18 | James A Nichting | Salem, IA 52649 | $3,699 |
19 | Woline Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $3,685 |
20 | Neal E Krieger | New London, IA 52645 | $3,653 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>