Farm Subsidy information
Henry County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Henry County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,274
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Henry County, Iowa totaled $25,812,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gabeline Family Farms | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $794,381 |
| 2 | Moeller Farms Ltd | West Point, IA 52656 | $507,054 |
| 3 | Jason J Denning | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $498,262 |
| 4 | Woline Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $386,416 |
| 5 | Yoder Turkeys LLC | Crawfordsville, IA 52621 | $375,698 |
| 6 | Daniel Joseph Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $349,234 |
| 7 | Davis Brothers Farms Corp | Winfield, IA 52659 | $338,985 |
| 8 | Achen Farms Inc | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $312,188 |
| 9 | Larry D Anderson | Brighton, IA 52540 | $311,855 |
| 10 | Larry Joe Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $306,929 |
| 11 | Lehman Family Farms Inc. | New London, IA 52645 | $292,349 |
| 12 | Amc Farms Inc | Wayland, IA 52654 | $269,987 |
| 13 | Jt Achen Farms Inc | Wayland, IA 52654 | $260,045 |
| 14 | Michael T Roth | Wayland, IA 52654 | $246,089 |
| 15 | Leon Paul Peterson | Winfield, IA 52659 | $235,875 |
| 16 | Mark David Garrett | Wayland, IA 52654 | $208,520 |
| 17 | Cml Farms Corp | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $204,217 |
| 18 | Kurt E Alvine | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $195,619 |
| 19 | Mallams Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $186,381 |
| 20 | Mns Family Farms LLC | Salem, IA 52649 | $183,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf