Total Commodity Programs in Howard County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,002
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Howard County, Iowa totaled $213,855,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pinicon Farm | Mc Intire, IA 50455 | $3,384,781 |
2 | Saratoga Partnership | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $3,120,998 |
3 | D R S G Partnership | Cresco, IA 52136 | $2,848,067 |
4 | Ludwig Farms | Elma, IA 50628 | $2,025,179 |
5 | Paris Foods Inc | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,875,000 |
6 | Sovereigns Inc | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,751,297 |
7 | Kenneth Charles Moellers | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,625,738 |
8 | Kmax Farms LLC | Elma, IA 50628 | $1,596,040 |
9 | Randall William Smith | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,438,842 |
10 | Gregory Mark Mahr | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $1,324,081 |
11 | Neubauer Farms Inc | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $1,304,148 |
12 | Wayne Joseph Mlady | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,278,169 |
13 | Thomas Francis Shatek | Elma, IA 50628 | $1,274,160 |
14 | Pine Creek Farm Ltd | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $1,257,774 |
15 | Grover Farms Inc | Hudson, IA 50643 | $1,250,431 |
16 | Gansen L C | Elma, IA 50628 | $1,219,588 |
17 | Michael Dale Lewis | Chester, IA 52134 | $1,216,843 |
18 | Max Sylvester Schmidt | Elma, IA 50628 | $1,212,839 |
19 | Georgia Anne Schmidt | Elma, IA 50628 | $1,106,389 |
20 | Ronald John Swestka | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,089,103 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>